We now live in a globalized economy, and many people say it doesn’t matter where something is made. They say that the industrialization of third world countries is good because it has provided jobs for millions of people and raised their standard of living. American consumers have benefited from cheaper prices for the products they need and want. However, where products are made should matter to people who are concerned about the environment and the health and well-being of people around the world.
Manufacturing in America developed over a period of more than 200 years. It developed gradually, so there was the opportunity to learn about the hazards of industrialization on a smaller scale than has been possible with the rapid industrialization of developing countries. Pollution caused by specific industries affected small geographic areas, like West Virginia’s coal mining and Pennsylvania’s steel regions.The Bill of Rights provided freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and the right to assemble, enabling affected communities and workers to address unsafe working conditions and pollution. Residents spoke out against pollution’s health effects in their communities. Workers formed unions to fight for better working conditions and higher wages, especially in hazardous occupations. Newspapers, and later radio and TV, made the public aware of what was happening in factories and mines. After sufficient pressure was put on elected officials at the local, state, and federal levels, laws were passed that improved working conditions, protected worker safety, and reduced pollution.
As a result, great strides on these issues were made in the U.S. in the 20th century. These efforts culminated in the establishment of the Environmental Protection Agency in December 1970, consolidating 15 components from five agencies for the purpose of grouping all environmental regulatory activities in a single agency.
Since then, the U.S. has developed a comprehensive body of law to protect the environment and prevent pollution. The EPA enforces more than 15 statutes or laws, including the Clean Air Act; the Clean Water Act; the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act; the Endangered Species Act; the Pollution Prevention Act; and the Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticides Act. In turn, each of the 50 states has its own body of law to comply with federal laws and regulations.
Cleaning up the nation’s air, water, and land hasn’t come cheap. Since passing these laws, the U.S. government has spent trillions of dollars to clean up and prevent pollution. Individuals, small businesses, and corporations paid the taxes that funded these programs. But businesses were hit with a double whammy. They not only had to pay taxes for the government to carry out its end of these programs, they had to pay cleanup costs for their own sites and buy the equipment to prevent future pollution. In addition, they had to hire and train personnel to implement and maintain mandated pollution prevention systems and procedures.
According to a Census Bureau report “Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures,” as a result of a survey of 20,000 plants last conducted in 2005, U.S. manufacturers spent $5.9 billion on pollution equipment, and another $20.7 billion on pollution prevention.
The EPA has achieved some major successes:
• New cars are 98 percent cleaner than in 1970 in terms of smog-forming pollutants.
• Dangerous air pollutants that cause smog, acid rain, lead poisoning have been reduced by 60 percent.
• Levels of lead in children’s blood have declined 75 percent.
• 60 percent of the nation’s waterways are safe for fishing and swimming.
• 92 percent of Americans receive water that meets health standards.
• 67 percent of contaminated Superfund sites nationwide have been cleaned up.
As a result, we now have cleaner air in our cities and cleaner and safer water in our streams, rivers, lakes, bays, and harbors than at any time since the Industrial Revolution began. These vast environmental improvements made in the last 40 years have benefitted every single American.
In contrast, India and China have been getting more polluted in the last 30 years as they have industrialized. Since 2006, Blacksmith Institute’s yearly reports have been instrumental in increasing public understanding of the health impacts posed by toxic pollution, and in some cases, have compelled cleanup work at pollution hotspots. Blacksmith Institute reports have been issued jointly with Green Cross Switzerland since 2007.
Six cities in China and four cities in India were listed in the Blacksmith Institute’s “Dirty 30” of the 2007 report, “The World’s Worst Polluted Places.” This list was based on scoring criteria devised by an international panel including researchers from Johns Hopkins, Harvard, and Mt. Sinai Hospital, along with specialists from Green Cross Switzerland who participated in assessing more than 400 polluted sites.
It’s hard to describe the horrors of pollution in Chinese cities. Imagine living in Xiditou (pronounced shee-dee-tow), about 60 miles east of Beijing, where the Feng Chan River that runs through the town is now black as ink and clotted with debris. The local economy has doubled in just four years, but at a terrible cost. More than 100 factories occupy what were once fields of rice and cotton. These include dozens of local chemical plants, makers of toxins including sulfuric acid, and these factories disgorge wastewater directly into the river. Industrial poisons have leached into groundwater, contaminating drinking supplies. The air has a distinctively sour odor. The rate of cancer is now more than 18 times the national average.
According to the USA Today article, “Pollution Poisons China’s Progress,” of July 4, 2005, “People regard their drinking water as little better than liquid poison, but unable to afford bottled water for all their daily needs, most adults continue to drink it. They buy mineral water only for their children.”
Another horrible location is Tianying, in Anhui province, which is one of the largest lead production centers in China, with an output of half of the country’s total. Low-level technologies, illegal operations, and a lack of air-pollution control measures have caused severe lead poisoning. Lead concentrations in the air and soil are 8.5 to 10 times national standards. Local crops and wheat at farmers’ homes are also contaminated by lead dust, at 24 times the national standard.
The ironic note to these statistics is that China actually has more stringent restrictions on lead than the U.S. The difference is that neither the local nor the national government is enforcing the laws. Residents, particularly children, suffer from lead poisoning, which causes encephalopathy, lower IQs, short attention spans, learning disabilities, hyperactivity, hearing and vision problems, stomachaches, kidney malfunction, anemia, and premature births.
Perhaps you would like to live in Wanshan, China, termed the mercury capital of China because more than 60 percent of the country’s mercury deposits were discovered there. Mercury contamination extends throughout the city’s air, surface water, and soils. Concentrations in the soil range from 24 to 348 mg/kg, 16 to 232 times the national standard. To p
ut this into perspective, the mercury from one fluorescent bulb can pollute 6,000 gallons of water beyond safe levels for drinking, and it only takes one teaspoon of mercury to contaminate a 20-acre lake – forever. Health hazards include kidney and gastrointestinal damage, neurological damage, and birth defects. Chronic exposure is fatal.
China is now the largest source of CO2 and SO2 emissions in the world (SO2 causes acid rain). Japan, South Korea, and the northwest region of the U.S. suffer from acid rain produced by China’s coal-fired power plants and higher CO2 readings from easterly trade winds.
The horrific effects of pollution in China and its staggering cost in human life, are a graphic example of why Chinese companies can outcompete American companies – not only because of their disparity in wages, but also because their government does not enforce the same environmental and social standards. As Americans, who place a high value on human life and protecting our environment, we wouldn’t have it any other way. But American manufacturing industries do pay a penalty competing against China.
During China’s rapid industrialization of the last 30 years, the U.S. has spent billions on technologies and equipment to clean up and prevent pollution. China had a golden opportunity to benefit from all the hard lessons learned by developed countries during their own industrialization. If China had purchased the pollution abatement equipment developed in the U.S., their industrialization would not have caused such horrendous pollution. Millions of lives would have been saved!
In the U.S., our landfills wouldn’t be filling up with discarded products from China that are so cheap that it is easier to throw them away than repair them. Wouldn’t it be worth paying more for “Made in USA” products that are higher quality and last longer?
Thus, if you are concerned about global pollution and want to save lives in both China and the U. S., you should choose to buy “Made in USA” products that have been produced in the most non-polluting manner that is technically feasible at present. My next article will take a look at India’s environment.
Why Tech Manufacturing Jobs Are Coming Back To America
in Jobs, Manufacturing & Sourcing/by MAM TeamTo start, offshoring isn’t as cheap as it used to be. For example, wages of around 60 cents an hour during the height of the technological migration to Asia have risen to as high as $6 per hour in China’s eastern manufacturing centers, according to JLL. Increasing oil prices also play a role.
Second, as tech companies see increasing global competition, they need to protect their intellectual capital in new product manufacturing, and keeping production of new products within the United States makes it easier.
Third, keeping operations in close proximity to executives, designers, and engineers helps the product launch teams stay on task and during critical early-stage production.
Fourth, tech companies with U.S. locations are better equipped to quickly address end-user needs.
Finally, companies are more likely to find the workers with the technical skills necessary to operate complex systems in today’s highly automated manufacturing facilities.
“This regionalization of high-tech manufacturing is characterized by the creation of jobs requiring strong technological skills — think engineers on production lines — as opposed to reshoring where similar job functions are imported back to the United States from overseas,” said Greg Matter, vice president at Jones Lang LaSalle. “Having access to this talent is one of the reasons that manufacturing facilities for technology firms are often located in tier-one locations where labor and real estate are generally more expensive.”
Indeed, about 79 percent of moderately high-tech manufacturing jobs and 95 percent of very high-tech manufacturing jobs were located in the 100 largest American metropolitan areas in 2010, according to JLL. More than one-third of the most high-tech positions reside in companies on the West Coast. Lower-level technology jobs, meanwhile, are most concentrated in the southern states.
JLL expects that through 2018, high-tech manufacturing jobs will proliferate further in Silicon Valley. Austin, too, is becoming a magnet for high-tech manufacturing growth. Other cities poised to attract these jobs include Los Angeles; Binghamton, N.Y.; Portland, Ore.; Boulder, Colo.; Phoenix, Az.; Boston; and Boise, Idaho.
This article, “Why tech manufacturing jobs are coming back to America,” was originally published at InfoWorld.com. Get the first word on what the important tech news really means with the InfoWorld Tech Watch blog. For the latest business technology news, follow InfoWorld.com on Twitter.
This Is The Way Blue-Collar America Ends
in Economy, Jobs/by MAM TeamRockwell Automation sold over $6 billion worth of industrial control products last year, more than half of those outside the United States and over one-fifth to emerging markets. Some 61 percent of its 22,000 employees are based outside the U.S. While 58 percent of last year’s sales were in manufactured devices, 42 percent were in computer hardware, software and communications components.
Take a close look at Rockwell Automation, and you’ll understand why the modern manufacturing industry manages to be both a tremendous economic driver and a tough business in which to get a job. It’s becoming standard for many manufacturing companies to require employees to have college degrees–and some jobs require a PhD. Factory-floor openings are scarce and often require specific credentials. A company like Rockwell Automation creates wealth and jobs all over the world, which is great for the world–and for shareholders– but not always so great for Milwaukee. The city’s number one economic problem is a lack of middle-income jobs, and no industry has yet emerged to replace the jobs the traditional manufacturing sector used to provide.
Rockwell Automation still has a production facility in the Milwaukee area, at an industrial park in a suburb called Mequon. Here, machines print circuit boards embedded with microprocessors containing software coded by Rockwell developers. The circuit boards are then fitted into variable-speed drives, electric motors built to carry specific loads as efficiently as possible. Workers assembling the drives are as likely to spend their shifts peering at data on a computer screen as they are wielding drills.
While the shop floor employs 350 people, the facility also houses 750 workers whose jobs range from marketing to procurement to engineering. The presence of higher-level expertise makes this facility a hub for service and repair work. “We love it because when we have a problem on the shop floor, I can grab an engineer by the ear,” says Thomas Groose, manufacturing engineering manager. Most of the folks working on the shop floor hail from the suburbs. “We’re not on a bus line here,” Groose notes.
Manufacturing remains an important sector in Milwaukee, employing some 14 percent of the metro area workforce. In Wisconsin, manufacturing accounts for about 18 percent of state GDP and 93 percent of exports, according to the National Association of Manufacturers.
But the city and the state have seen a steep decline in manufacturing jobs over the past half-century, and the kind of jobs that remain require a higher level of expertise. Between 1961 and 2001, the city of Milwaukee lost 69 percent of its manufacturing positions. Some of that work relocated to suburbs like Mequon. But overall, the seven counties in southeastern Wisconsin saw a loss of 83,000 jobs, according to Vanderwalle & Associates, a Wisconsin economic strategy firm.
Many jobs disappeared altogether, as high-tech equipment replaced manual labor. The jobs that remain increasingly require applicants to present a two-year degree or a specific certification. Today, fewer than 40 percent of U.S. manufacturing employees have jobs in actual production, according to the Congressional Research Service. The loss of manufacturing jobs had devastating impact on Milwaukee. Like other post-industrial cities, Milwaukee has suffered decades of economic decline and a spike in inner-city unemployment. Today, the city of Milwaukee has the lowest employment rate for working-age African-American males of any city in the country–worse even than Detroit, according to research from Professor Marc Levine at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. The manufacturing jobs that remain are largely suburban and inaccessible by public transportation, putting them out of reach for the population that needs them the most.
Making factories more productive is Rockwell Automation’s business, and executives there find the media focus on job loss frustrating. “We’d like you to start talking about output, and judge manufacturing based on how much stuff we make, not on how many jobs,” says John Bernaden, director of external communications. He points to figures illustrating a 15 percent productivity increase in American manufacturing since 2009 and 16 percent output growth.
Besides, counting manufacturing jobs is misleading, as growth in the sector creates jobs elsewhere, says Michael Laszkiewicz, vice president and general manager of the power control business at Rockwell Automation. “When we make a decision to build a new plant or establish a new product line, and we add new people in manufacturing, for every ten manufacturing jobs we add five or six jobs in the supply chain supporting manufacturing,” he says, including other transportation and service jobs.
“When I look at our economic challenges and the need to reduce unemployment, I think manufacturing needs to get a priority in terms of regulatory and legislative policy so that it’s encouraged to grow,” Laszkiewicz says.
The problem, from the perspective of the average Milwaukeean, is that when a global business like Rockwell Automation builds a new plant, it could just as easily be in Shanghai or Singapore as in Oconomowoc. The supply chain impact need not accrue only in the United States. More often than not, the spillover benefit is spread all over the world, like the company’s business. And support work in service industries often doesn’t pay workers a family-supporting wage.
Rockwell Automation has achieved great success since taking over the Allen-Bradley Company in 1985, but Rockwell and its peers haven’t brought Milwaukee mass prosperity the way that Allen-Bradley and its peers once did. The fourth industrial revolution may be on the horizon, but right now real wages in the area are flat and unemployment remains high.
Rockwell is still hiring, and it’s still taking on entry-level workers. But the company doesn’t hire just anyone. On the shop floor, the company is seeking high-performing students and workers with technical skills. And for its offices, it needs firmware development engineers. “The bar has been raised,” Laszkiewicz says.
Lenovo Paves the Way for Made in America Computers
in American Made, Manufacturing & Sourcing/by MAM Team“There’s a business case to be had for manufacturing here in the U.S.,” Lenovo’s North American President Jay Parker told ABC News’ “World News” in an interview at the new facility. “Some customers desire to have products that are assembled in the U.S. and so we believe it’s a competitive advantage for us.”
New Jobs, New Business Model
Lenovo, which is the second-largest PC manufacturer in the world, began production of its ThinkCentre M92p desktop and its ThinkPad Helix convertible ultrabook at the plant in January but will ramp up full production by the end of this month by adding the ThinkPad Tablet 2.
The Nances are just two of the 115 new employees to work on the manufacturing lines in the 240,000-square-foot facility. And as Lenovo expands production into tablets and then servers by the end of the year, Parker says the job numbers will go up.
“This is our first step. If we continue to grow, we’ll continue to scale up that facility,” he said.
Lenovo hopes to assemble several hundred thousand units in the first full year of production with two eight-hour shifts five days a week. The products will be made primarily for the U.S. market and will be shipped throughout the country.The computers will be assembled in North Carolina, but much of the parts and components, including the processor and RAM, will be made overseas and imported.
Lenovo, which was started in China and is headquartered in Beijing, will still make the majority of its products in its native country. It, along with many of the other major computer makers, moved production offshore when overseas labor became cheaper.
But that trend is reversing, even if it is on a smaller scale.
“Over time, and this isn’t just true of China, but the labor rates around the world have been compressing to some degree with the U.S.,” Parker said. “The labor rate difference isn’t quite what it was at one point. And when you’re talking about having to ship products from China or anywhere overseas, then there’s a logistics cost there that you can save partially by doing it here in the U.S.”
Motorola’s Moto X Phone Will Also Be Made in America
Parker said that doesn’t mean it is less expensive or even comparable in expenses to make products in the U.S., but the company does see other advantages, including speed of delivery, customization, and then the “Made in America” marketing message.
Google, Motorola and More
And Lenovo isn’t the only consumer electronics maker that sees it that way. Motorola announced last week that its plans to build its forthcoming Moto X Android smartphone in Fort Worth, Texas will result in 2,000 new jobs. Google has also started to assemble its Google Glass in California. Apple has also announced its plans to make a version of a Mac computer in the U.S. later this summer.
HP, Lenovo’s closest competitor in the PC market and the No. 1 maker of PCs, has made a select few of its enterprise desktop and workstations in a facility in Indianapolis, although hasn’t made any consumer-aimed computers there. Dell also says it has had a U.S.-based manufacturing presence, and that its server systems are made at its campus in Austin, Texas.
Whether those other companies will grow computer manufacturing in America remains to be seen, but Lenovo has made it very clear: This is just the start for the company. “For manufacturing, it’s a start,” Parker said. “And as long as we’re continuing to grow at the rate we’ve grown at, we look to add to that over time. We believe that it’s possible and probable [to grow].”
That promise of more growth makes Stephanie Nance excited as she puts on more stickers on the Made in America hardware. “It’s not some job that can just be sent anywhere,” she says. “We can do the same thing that they can here just as good as quality as overseas.”
Google-owned Motorola Builds World’s First Made in America Smartphone in Texas
in American Made, Manufacturing & Sourcing/by MAM TeamGoogle has tried making hardware in the United States before. Last year, it planned to assemble the Nexus Q, a home media player, in California. But the company postponed the device after it received poor reviews and then quietly killed it.
Mr. Woodside said Motorola and Google were taking over an old Nokia manufacturing plant that had employed 16,000 workers when it was last in use 15 years ago. He said around 2,000 employees would be hired to work at the 500,000-square-foot building. The plant will be up and running by August, he said.
The new workers will be employed by Flextronics, a manufacturing company Motorola hires for its work worldwide. They will be hired by August in jobs ranging from entry level roles to engineering, said Danielle McNally, a Motorola spokeswoman. The new jobs are “different and separate” from the more than 4,000 positions that Motorola eliminated last year, she said.
Mr. Woodside acknowledged that while the Moto X will be built in the United States, not all of its parts would necessarily come from American manufacturers.
“The components will come all over the world,” he said. Display parts will be built in South Korea, for example, and processors will be made in Taiwan, he said.
Google executives have given clues about what a Motorola phone would do. It would have batteries that last longer than a day, they have said, would not break when dropped and would include features like a better camera, artificial intelligence and sensors that recognize people’s voices in a room, for example.
“Think about your device — battery life is a problem, if a kid spills a drink on your tablet screen it shouldn’t die, if you drop your phone it shouldn’t shatter,” Larry Page, the chief executive of Google, told analysts last month. “There’s real potential to invent new and better experiences, ones that are much faster and more intuitive. So having just seen Motorola’s upcoming products myself, I’m really excited about the potential there.”
Mr. Woodside said Wednesday, though, that phones with unbreakable screens would not be included in this year’s Motorola phones.
Mr. Woodside said the Moto X phone was in his pocket — but coyly shook his head when asked to show it off.
Claire Cain Miller contributed reporting.
Norridge Boutique: Selling Made in USA Merchandise
in American Made, Marketing Your Brand/by MAM TeamEva DeFilippis of Elmwood Park has wanted to find space to open a boutique for some time.
The graduate of Trinity High School in River Forest has a background in clothing.
“My dad was a tailor and owned a clothing store,” DeFilippis said. “We kept some of the fixtures from that store, and now those racks are in this store.
“It’s like he’s here with us,” she said with a smile.
DeFilippis’ Deva Salon, now in its third incarnation, is a couple of doors down from Boutique3, in the same plaza.
“I never seemed to have the space for the boutique,” she said. “I first opened (Deva Salon) 14 years ago near Irving Park Road and Cumberland.
“I moved into a larger space (in Regency Plaza) and again to an even larger space,” she said. “But I still didn’t have the room.
“So when this place was available, I thought this would be perfect.”
Joining Esposito and DeFilippis in this venture is DeFilippis’ sister-in-law, Geralyn.
Esposito, a surgical assistant by trade and friends with the DeFilippis women, said she always wanted to be her own boss.
“Owning my own business has been a vision for me, a goal,” Esposito said. “But it’s so hard to start a business.”
She finds the boutique to be a godsend.
“Monday through Friday, I’m a surgical assistant,” she said. “Saturday and Sunday, I’m here.
“I love this so much. It’s so wonderful.”
Among the reasons the women find the shop so rewarding, they said, is they can bring to the area quality fashions at reasonable prices compared to other, similar stores in the surrounding communities. And a lot of the products in competing shops, they said, are made abroad, with China dominating the labels.
Eva DeFilippis said her inspiration to open Boutique3 was the lack of choices for one-of-a-kind clothing in the area.
“No woman wants to look like everyone else,” she said. “In the 1980s, we used to shop boutiques.
“Then something happened, and the little specialty stops disappeared,” she noted. “We want to bring back that unique shopping experience.”
Esposito agreed.
“Even though we haven’t been open that long, we have quite a few customers who say this shop is so convenient,” she noted. “And more and more people are looking at the label to see if it was made here.”
Boutique3
5050 N. Cumberland Ave. in Regency Plaza, Norridge
(708) 456-1230
www.SalonDevaBoutique3.com
Specializes in affordable fashions made in the United States
Hours: 10:30 a.m.-6 p.m. Tuesday-Friday
10 a.m.-5 p.m. Saturday and Sunday.
Hours to expand during the summer season; adding mother-of-the-bride dresses in the fall
Closed Monday
Made in America Company Lacks Support
in American Made, Manufacturing & Sourcing/by MAM TeamBut what if you couldn’t find investors to help you grow your American-made business unless you took your product overseas. A local business is facing that dilemma and 10News spoke with the owner who says that the company is now turning to the general public for help.
“I had an issue with my underarms sweating when I got nervous,” said Billy Thompson, owner of Thompson Tee.
Thompson turned his unusual problem into a thriving business — making garments that uses patent-pending technology to prevent embarrassing pit stains. The company is growing, profitable and made in America. But that seems to be a problem.
“You’re definitely fighting against the grain trying to produce garments here in America,” Thompson said.
Thompson and his partners are proud to be American-made. They want to keep Thompson Tee in the U.S. and they’re willing to pay twice as much in labor to do so.
But they can’t seem to find an investor who feels the same way. They had a big offer to take the product overseas, like a lot of other major clothing lines, where production costs would be cut dramatically. But Thompson and his partners turned down the lucrative offer.
“You know when you sit back and you think about it and you do a gut check and you think ‘OK, when we started this thing what were the core values to us?’ ” said Thompson. “And one of them was being made in the U.S.A.”
Now, the company is turning to crowdfunding. It started a grassroots, online campaign to raise the $25,000 needed to cover materials and labor. That would keep Thompson Tee in America and create American jobs.
“So we’ll see if the American public really does have an appetite for American made goods,” he said.
The crowdfunding campaign began June 1. Thompson said failure is not an option and that the company plans to stay in the U.S. no matter what.
Learn more about the company by watching the video below:
Does It Matter Where Products Are Made?
in American Made, Manufacturing & Sourcing/by MAM TeamAs a result, great strides on these issues were made in the U.S. in the 20th century. These efforts culminated in the establishment of the Environmental Protection Agency in December 1970, consolidating 15 components from five agencies for the purpose of grouping all environmental regulatory activities in a single agency.
Since then, the U.S. has developed a comprehensive body of law to protect the environment and prevent pollution. The EPA enforces more than 15 statutes or laws, including the Clean Air Act; the Clean Water Act; the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act; the Endangered Species Act; the Pollution Prevention Act; and the Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticides Act. In turn, each of the 50 states has its own body of law to comply with federal laws and regulations.
Cleaning up the nation’s air, water, and land hasn’t come cheap. Since passing these laws, the U.S. government has spent trillions of dollars to clean up and prevent pollution. Individuals, small businesses, and corporations paid the taxes that funded these programs. But businesses were hit with a double whammy. They not only had to pay taxes for the government to carry out its end of these programs, they had to pay cleanup costs for their own sites and buy the equipment to prevent future pollution. In addition, they had to hire and train personnel to implement and maintain mandated pollution prevention systems and procedures.
According to a Census Bureau report “Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures,” as a result of a survey of 20,000 plants last conducted in 2005, U.S. manufacturers spent $5.9 billion on pollution equipment, and another $20.7 billion on pollution prevention.
The EPA has achieved some major successes:
• New cars are 98 percent cleaner than in 1970 in terms of smog-forming pollutants.
• Dangerous air pollutants that cause smog, acid rain, lead poisoning have been reduced by 60 percent.
• Levels of lead in children’s blood have declined 75 percent.
• 60 percent of the nation’s waterways are safe for fishing and swimming.
• 92 percent of Americans receive water that meets health standards.
• 67 percent of contaminated Superfund sites nationwide have been cleaned up.
As a result, we now have cleaner air in our cities and cleaner and safer water in our streams, rivers, lakes, bays, and harbors than at any time since the Industrial Revolution began. These vast environmental improvements made in the last 40 years have benefitted every single American.
In contrast, India and China have been getting more polluted in the last 30 years as they have industrialized. Since 2006, Blacksmith Institute’s yearly reports have been instrumental in increasing public understanding of the health impacts posed by toxic pollution, and in some cases, have compelled cleanup work at pollution hotspots. Blacksmith Institute reports have been issued jointly with Green Cross Switzerland since 2007.
Six cities in China and four cities in India were listed in the Blacksmith Institute’s “Dirty 30” of the 2007 report, “The World’s Worst Polluted Places.” This list was based on scoring criteria devised by an international panel including researchers from Johns Hopkins, Harvard, and Mt. Sinai Hospital, along with specialists from Green Cross Switzerland who participated in assessing more than 400 polluted sites.
It’s hard to describe the horrors of pollution in Chinese cities. Imagine living in Xiditou (pronounced shee-dee-tow), about 60 miles east of Beijing, where the Feng Chan River that runs through the town is now black as ink and clotted with debris. The local economy has doubled in just four years, but at a terrible cost. More than 100 factories occupy what were once fields of rice and cotton. These include dozens of local chemical plants, makers of toxins including sulfuric acid, and these factories disgorge wastewater directly into the river. Industrial poisons have leached into groundwater, contaminating drinking supplies. The air has a distinctively sour odor. The rate of cancer is now more than 18 times the national average.
According to the USA Today article, “Pollution Poisons China’s Progress,” of July 4, 2005, “People regard their drinking water as little better than liquid poison, but unable to afford bottled water for all their daily needs, most adults continue to drink it. They buy mineral water only for their children.”
Another horrible location is Tianying, in Anhui province, which is one of the largest lead production centers in China, with an output of half of the country’s total. Low-level technologies, illegal operations, and a lack of air-pollution control measures have caused severe lead poisoning. Lead concentrations in the air and soil are 8.5 to 10 times national standards. Local crops and wheat at farmers’ homes are also contaminated by lead dust, at 24 times the national standard.
The ironic note to these statistics is that China actually has more stringent restrictions on lead than the U.S. The difference is that neither the local nor the national government is enforcing the laws. Residents, particularly children, suffer from lead poisoning, which causes encephalopathy, lower IQs, short attention spans, learning disabilities, hyperactivity, hearing and vision problems, stomachaches, kidney malfunction, anemia, and premature births.
Perhaps you would like to live in Wanshan, China, termed the mercury capital of China because more than 60 percent of the country’s mercury deposits were discovered there. Mercury contamination extends throughout the city’s air, surface water, and soils. Concentrations in the soil range from 24 to 348 mg/kg, 16 to 232 times the national standard. To p
ut this into perspective, the mercury from one fluorescent bulb can pollute 6,000 gallons of water beyond safe levels for drinking, and it only takes one teaspoon of mercury to contaminate a 20-acre lake – forever. Health hazards include kidney and gastrointestinal damage, neurological damage, and birth defects. Chronic exposure is fatal.
China is now the largest source of CO2 and SO2 emissions in the world (SO2 causes acid rain). Japan, South Korea, and the northwest region of the U.S. suffer from acid rain produced by China’s coal-fired power plants and higher CO2 readings from easterly trade winds.
The horrific effects of pollution in China and its staggering cost in human life, are a graphic example of why Chinese companies can outcompete American companies – not only because of their disparity in wages, but also because their government does not enforce the same environmental and social standards. As Americans, who place a high value on human life and protecting our environment, we wouldn’t have it any other way. But American manufacturing industries do pay a penalty competing against China.
During China’s rapid industrialization of the last 30 years, the U.S. has spent billions on technologies and equipment to clean up and prevent pollution. China had a golden opportunity to benefit from all the hard lessons learned by developed countries during their own industrialization. If China had purchased the pollution abatement equipment developed in the U.S., their industrialization would not have caused such horrendous pollution. Millions of lives would have been saved!
In the U.S., our landfills wouldn’t be filling up with discarded products from China that are so cheap that it is easier to throw them away than repair them. Wouldn’t it be worth paying more for “Made in USA” products that are higher quality and last longer?
Thus, if you are concerned about global pollution and want to save lives in both China and the U. S., you should choose to buy “Made in USA” products that have been produced in the most non-polluting manner that is technically feasible at present. My next article will take a look at India’s environment.
Could Newark Be a Manufacturing Hub Again?
in Manufacturing & Sourcing/by MAM TeamU.S. Isn't Respecting Meat Labeling Rules, Mexico says
in Economy, Manufacturing & Sourcing/by MAM Team“We can’t understand why once the very WTO issues a ruling, the government of the United States does not respect it,” Martinez said.
“We have talked with beef producers in the United States and Canada, and totally agree this is an arbitrary decision and means discrimination against Mexican beef, which we will never agree with and as a government will defend against.”
Meat exporters in Canada and Mexico say the new rules would cut even deeper into cattle and hog shipments that have already slumped by as much as half in the last four years.
The Canadian government has threatened a possible retaliatory strike against U.S. imports, and is hoping Mexico will join it.
The WTO Appellate Body said last year that U.S. country-of-origin labeling rules, commonly known as COOL, were wrong because they gave less favorable treatment to beef and pork imported from Mexico and Canada than to U.S. meat.
Meat labels became mandatory in March 2009 after years of debate. U.S. consumer and some farm groups supported the requirement, saying consumers should have information to distinguish between U.S. and foreign products.
Garments Can Be Made in USA Safely, with Profit
in American Made, Manufacturing & Sourcing/by MAM TeamWhy did the garment industry leave El Paso?
In 2002 the World Trade Organization allowed foreign made products to be imported in the U.S. without tariffs. This allowed low dollar garments to be sold in the U.S. at lower prices than what most American manufacturers could compete with. Many American manufacturers left and when they went, so did the blue jean capitol of the world.
At around 2002, a man named Lawson Nickol had been working for a USA made jeans manufacturer who decided to leave the U.S. and manufacture its items in Mexico. Nickol could not bear the decision as he was a passionate USA made supporter who felt a strong responsibility to support American workers. He soon resigned and started a USA made jean manufacturer of his own with the help of his son BJ – the All American Clothing Co.
The All American Clothing Co. struggled at first, surviving on family savings, financial risks, and working long hours. Yet each year, the USA jean company continued to grow. After 11 years in the business, the All American Clothing Co. has gone from a small closet in warehouse space to 45,000 square feet of warehouse and main offices. The company is now operating a cut and sew factory in El Paso, Texas attempting to create jobs and bring back the once blue jean capitol of the world.
If their success continues, rebirthing the American denim industry will be the All American Clothing Company`s legacy. Together with it`s leadership, employees, patrons, and supporters they will continue to spread the word, help to fill empty buildings with employees, and create American jobs. It`s an All American thing.
For the original version on PRWeb visit:
http://www.prweb.com/releases/prwebUSA-made-jeans/made-in-America-jeans/prweb10764885.htm