Workers prepare engine cylinder liners for packaging at the US distribution arm of ZYNP China Manufacturing, in Romulus, Michigan, near Detroit. Michael Barris / China Daily
Despite the Motor City’s bankruptcy filing last week, its abundant engineering talent and car history lure Chinese automobile companies seeking global expansion, as Michael Barris reports from Detroit.
Reposted from China Daily:
Detroit is still Motor City – at least to Chinese automotive companies doing business here.
In the past decade, dozens of them have been drawn to the area, not just because of its existing infrastructure, supply network, abundance of skilled workers or tax benefits, but because of Detroit’s pivotal role in automobile history.
“It is the center of modern vehicle technology,” proclaims John Yang, chief metallurgist with ZYNP International, the US distribution arm of engine cylinder-maker ZYNP China Manufacturing. The facility is located in Romulus, Michigan, about 25 miles southwest of Detroit. “This area still has its strength in technology and talent,” Yang said in an interview.
Overwhelmed by a debt of at least $18 billion, Detroit filed for Chapter 9 bankruptcy protection last week, the largest such filing in US history. A legal muddle created by a county judge’s ruling that the filing was unconstitutional was lifted on Wednesday when a federal bankruptcy judge cleared the way for the case to go forward without legal challenges.
As China’s leadership boosts research and development for auto parts, mandated by the latest five-year plan (2011-15), Chinese automotive companies have stepped up their activity around Detroit, doing everything from R&D on behalf of parent companies back home to making parts exclusively for US auto makers.
Their arrival is welcomed by the state government, led by Republican Governor Rick Snyder, former chairman of California computer-maker Gateway Inc, and ex-chairman and CEO of Michigan venture-capital firm Ardesta LLC. The first-term Snyder administration sees China’s interest in learning more about automobile production as a chance to create jobs for a hard-hit region.
Michigan was in the grip of a deep, decade-long recession through 2010. The state, whose economy is disproportionately affected by the automotive industry, lost nearly 218,000 manufacturing jobs from 2000 to 2005. It suffered further near the end of the decade when auto sales at General Motors, Ford and Chrysler plunged because the Detroit Three couldn’t compete against fuel-efficient Japanese cars at a time of high gas prices. The US industry’s woes were symbolized by the Chapter 11 bankruptcy filings of GM and Chrysler in 2009, moves now seen as necessary steps in the auto industry’s recent resurgence.
More and better jobs
Last year, the Great Lakes State, struggling to recover from the economic slump, exported $3.2 billion of goods and services to China, a 25 percent jump from 2011 and lagging behind only Canada and Mexico. Michigan received more than $917 million in capital from China in 2012 to become one of its top 10 direct-investment states.
“More and better jobs are created both by promoting Michigan exports to China and by attracting Chinese companies to locate operations in Michigan,” said Michael Finney, president and CEO of the Michigan Economic Development Corp, a public-private partnership that provides grants, loans and other economic assistance to businesses that make investments or create jobs in the state.
Finney calls China’s economic growth “an opportunity” for Michigan. Chinese officials feel the same way. During a recent visit to the Detroit Chinese Business Association in Troy, about 40 kilometers north of the city, Zhao Weiping, China’s Chicago-based consul general to the Midwest, called Michigan “an important business partner of China”.
The Chinese auto industry’s increasing presence in the Detroit suburbs continues a pattern of auto-production decentralization that started in the 1920s and shifted into high gear in the 1940s and 1950s, when GM, Ford and Chrysler expanded into new facilities around Detroit. That move helped push auto production into a truly national industry, responsible, at the city’s height at mid-century, for one in every six US jobs.
Detroit’s connection with a golden age of American automobile manufacturing fascinates Chinese automotive executives.
“Here in Detroit, we have a tradition,” said Jerry Xu, president of the Detroit Chinese Business Association, a nonprofit business network that fosters bilateral business relationships between US and Chinese companies. “We have a lot of history and experience that no other place can have. That is why Detroit is always respected by the Chinese as the place for the automotive industry.”
The business association estimates that about 100 Chinese firms, mostly in the auto industry, are active in the region. Those who come here typically aim to make a name for themselves in the global marketplace via Detroit, which has retained its legacy as a model for American innovation, notwithstanding its long decline and financial problems, Xu said.
Understanding that the path to success is through the Motor City, “they have to find a way to push through and come to the US, to the Michigan area, to realize that aspiration,” Xu said.
Sometimes, he said, large companies come with abundant talent and experience in doing business in the US. But “there are a lot of Chinese medium and small businesses that need help when they come”, Xu said.
The area’s abundant engineering talent is a magnet for Chinese auto-related companies looking to increase their knowledge of automobile production.
Hong Su, vice-president in charge of research at the United States R&D center for Chinese automaker Changan, in Plymouth, Michigan, about 40 km west of Detroit, said he has hired about 20 engineers with US auto industry experience in the last few years because of their expertise in developing vehicles.
Chassis class“In China, at original equipment manufacturers, the senior people – even managers and directors in engineering – have fewer than 10 years, 15 years of experience,” Su said. “And most of that experience is in reverse-engineering, or copying. They don’t have vehicle-development experience.” Su chuckled as he said the youngest engineer at the US R&D center, which focuses on chassis design, has 19 years of Detroit industry experience, which is more than some senior managers in China. By contrast, his most senior employee, retired, had 35 years of experience.
China has reverse-engineered many cars, but even creating a copy requires vehicle-development know-how, Su said. “Vehicles have copyright issues; sometimes you are forced to modify. If you don’t know the principles of how to modify, you can’t do it.”
Most important, you need vehicle-development expertise to make automobiles to the performance and quality specifications demanded by today’s buyers, he said.
|
|
“You can never copy the technical know-how,” he said, as he showed a prototype of a large sedan that Changan, traditionally a maker of smaller cars, plans to build and sell in China. When
finis
hed, the car will target prosperous buyers with families who also crave a big, luxurious vehicle.
Frank Yang, managing director at ZYNP International in Romulus, said the combination of the Detroit area’s existing transportation and manufacturing infrastructure, talent pool and cost-efficiency, along with government tax breaks, allow that US unit to pursue its plan to be a one-stop, full-service company in the engine cylinder industry. ZYNP International’s ability to offer customers R&D, engineering, supply chain management, manufacturing and financing under one roof “differentiates us from competitors, either locally or internationally”, Yang said.
A wide range
“All this is hard to find in other areas of the country,” he said. “Detroit is the hub.”
Showing that being Chinese doesn’t guarantee a job here, ZYND’s Romulus-based engineering staff hail from a range of countries, including China, the US, Brazil, Mexico and Canada. The company employs 50 to 80 people, including seasonal workers. Most are Americans or US residents. The staff include one or two Chinese nationals and very few Chinese Americans because the company emphasizes US industry experience.
“We only have visitors from our China operation to do troubleshooting, to undertake training, to give training, and to receive whatever knowledge they can take from the US,” Yang explained.
He said the company used its flexible pay system and entrepreneurship programs to lure valuable laid-off engineers “to grow together with us”.
At ZYNP, workers repackage engine cylinder liners in returnable containers, or “dunnage”, made in China for direct shipment to customers that include GM, Ford, Chrysler, Volvo, Nemak and Cummins.
ZYNP’s history dates back more than 50 years in Mengzhou, China, where it has its manufacturing operations. The company, which employs 3,500 people in China and North America, started ZYNP North America in two Romulus locations in 2005.
Program development manager Leslie Santos said Detroit’s bankruptcy “does not impact ZYNP’s business or plans. Although ZYNP is in the metropolitan Detroit area, that does not mean we are located in the city. We are not connected to Detroit as far as our administration or anything like that. We just say we’re in Detroit because Detroit is so well known as the automotive capital of the world,” she said.
Despite Motown’s well-publicized woes, the Chinese automotive companies’ arrival has triggered an influx of companies from other fields. The new arrivals are “looking for clean technologies, environmental and water solutions” as directed by China’s latest Five-Year Plan, according to Milan Stevanovich, business community development officer with the Detroit Chinese Business Association.
“We’ve had such an overabundance of automotive engineers here over the last five years. A lot of these engineers here are now either working with angel capitalists or are just starting new startups in all these new emerging sectors,” Stevanovich said. “It’s quite an exciting time to be here in Michigan.”
Some observers see China eventually joining Japan, Germany, South Korea and other foreign countries in making and selling vehicles in the US. A March report by the US Congressional Research Service said the Chinese government ultimately is “seeking to develop vehicles that will be built in China and exported more widely to other markets, as the Japanese and Koreans did earlier”.
China already is a major importer of US auto parts. Last year it imported about $1.6 billion parts, according to United States International Trade Commission statistics. The Congressional Research Service report says recent acquisitions of US parts companies will help Chinese parts makers “target technology and product innovations to enhance their operations” back home while “also permitting a shift from supplying low-margin parts to more profitable activities, such as integrating parts into component systems”.
Joint venture
China’s recent acquisitions include Chinese auto-parts conglomerate Wanxiang Group’s $250 million acquisition early this year of US battery maker A123 Systems Inc; the purchase by Pacific Century Motors, a joint venture between the Beijing municipal government and another Chinese partner, of Nexteer Automotive from GM in 2010 for $450 million, the largest Chinese acquisition of a US auto parts company; and the purchase by Beijing West Industries, a joint venture of two Chinese State-owned enterprises, of the suspension and brake units of Delphi Corp in 2009 for $100 million.
Making and selling vehicles in the US would cap off the Chinese auto industry’s 30-year effort to develop globally, which reached a milestone in 2009 when it overtook the US to become the world’s largest producer of and market for motor vehicles.
Jerry Xu says the days of China making and selling cars in the US could happen.
“China is not the first group to come here to do business,” Xu said. “There’s Korean, Japanese, there’s German.
“As long as you have good quality and service, the American market is open for you.”
But the Chinese firms “have to better themselves. They have to make sure they provide value to get business market share here,” he said. “They have to continue to prove themselves, make sure they have a long-term plan to grow here. To be successful, they have to make themselves a citizen of their community.”
Changan’s Su says the US may have to wait five to 10 years to see the first Chinese car sold here, given the engineering techniques typically demanded by developed nations, including pollution-control and safety features. He cites the slow rise of Japan’s Toyota Motor Corp as an example of how emerging nations can eventually break through in the fiercely competitive global market.
“Twenty-five years ago, the Japanese came here and tried to study the US market,” Su said. Now Toyota can match strides with GM and Ford in the world market. But even Toyota is a relative newcomer to the US marketplace compared with one particular Detroit icon that still continues to have its world headquarters in the Motor City.
“General Motors,” he said, “is more than 100 years old.”
SOURCE: China DailyContact the writer at michaelbarris@chinadailyusa.com
Detroit: Gold mine for China
in Uncategorized/by MAM TeamDetroit is still Motor City – at least to Chinese automotive companies doing business here.
In the past decade, dozens of them have been drawn to the area, not just because of its existing infrastructure, supply network, abundance of skilled workers or tax benefits, but because of Detroit’s pivotal role in automobile history.
“It is the center of modern vehicle technology,” proclaims John Yang, chief metallurgist with ZYNP International, the US distribution arm of engine cylinder-maker ZYNP China Manufacturing. The facility is located in Romulus, Michigan, about 25 miles southwest of Detroit. “This area still has its strength in technology and talent,” Yang said in an interview.
Overwhelmed by a debt of at least $18 billion, Detroit filed for Chapter 9 bankruptcy protection last week, the largest such filing in US history. A legal muddle created by a county judge’s ruling that the filing was unconstitutional was lifted on Wednesday when a federal bankruptcy judge cleared the way for the case to go forward without legal challenges.
As China’s leadership boosts research and development for auto parts, mandated by the latest five-year plan (2011-15), Chinese automotive companies have stepped up their activity around Detroit, doing everything from R&D on behalf of parent companies back home to making parts exclusively for US auto makers.
Their arrival is welcomed by the state government, led by Republican Governor Rick Snyder, former chairman of California computer-maker Gateway Inc, and ex-chairman and CEO of Michigan venture-capital firm Ardesta LLC. The first-term Snyder administration sees China’s interest in learning more about automobile production as a chance to create jobs for a hard-hit region.
Michigan was in the grip of a deep, decade-long recession through 2010. The state, whose economy is disproportionately affected by the automotive industry, lost nearly 218,000 manufacturing jobs from 2000 to 2005. It suffered further near the end of the decade when auto sales at General Motors, Ford and Chrysler plunged because the Detroit Three couldn’t compete against fuel-efficient Japanese cars at a time of high gas prices. The US industry’s woes were symbolized by the Chapter 11 bankruptcy filings of GM and Chrysler in 2009, moves now seen as necessary steps in the auto industry’s recent resurgence.
More and better jobs
Last year, the Great Lakes State, struggling to recover from the economic slump, exported $3.2 billion of goods and services to China, a 25 percent jump from 2011 and lagging behind only Canada and Mexico. Michigan received more than $917 million in capital from China in 2012 to become one of its top 10 direct-investment states.
“More and better jobs are created both by promoting Michigan exports to China and by attracting Chinese companies to locate operations in Michigan,” said Michael Finney, president and CEO of the Michigan Economic Development Corp, a public-private partnership that provides grants, loans and other economic assistance to businesses that make investments or create jobs in the state.
Finney calls China’s economic growth “an opportunity” for Michigan. Chinese officials feel the same way. During a recent visit to the Detroit Chinese Business Association in Troy, about 40 kilometers north of the city, Zhao Weiping, China’s Chicago-based consul general to the Midwest, called Michigan “an important business partner of China”.
The Chinese auto industry’s increasing presence in the Detroit suburbs continues a pattern of auto-production decentralization that started in the 1920s and shifted into high gear in the 1940s and 1950s, when GM, Ford and Chrysler expanded into new facilities around Detroit. That move helped push auto production into a truly national industry, responsible, at the city’s height at mid-century, for one in every six US jobs.
Detroit’s connection with a golden age of American automobile manufacturing fascinates Chinese automotive executives.
“Here in Detroit, we have a tradition,” said Jerry Xu, president of the Detroit Chinese Business Association, a nonprofit business network that fosters bilateral business relationships between US and Chinese companies. “We have a lot of history and experience that no other place can have. That is why Detroit is always respected by the Chinese as the place for the automotive industry.”
The business association estimates that about 100 Chinese firms, mostly in the auto industry, are active in the region. Those who come here typically aim to make a name for themselves in the global marketplace via Detroit, which has retained its legacy as a model for American innovation, notwithstanding its long decline and financial problems, Xu said.
Understanding that the path to success is through the Motor City, “they have to find a way to push through and come to the US, to the Michigan area, to realize that aspiration,” Xu said.
Sometimes, he said, large companies come with abundant talent and experience in doing business in the US. But “there are a lot of Chinese medium and small businesses that need help when they come”, Xu said.
The area’s abundant engineering talent is a magnet for Chinese auto-related companies looking to increase their knowledge of automobile production.
Hong Su, vice-president in charge of research at the United States R&D center for Chinese automaker Changan, in Plymouth, Michigan, about 40 km west of Detroit, said he has hired about 20 engineers with US auto industry experience in the last few years because of their expertise in developing vehicles.
“In China, at original equipment manufacturers, the senior people – even managers and directors in engineering – have fewer than 10 years, 15 years of experience,” Su said. “And most of that experience is in reverse-engineering, or copying. They don’t have vehicle-development experience.” Su chuckled as he said the youngest engineer at the US R&D center, which focuses on chassis design, has 19 years of Detroit industry experience, which is more than some senior managers in China. By contrast, his most senior employee, retired, had 35 years of experience.
China has reverse-engineered many cars, but even creating a copy requires vehicle-development know-how, Su said. “Vehicles have copyright issues; sometimes you are forced to modify. If you don’t know the principles of how to modify, you can’t do it.”
Most important, you need vehicle-development expertise to make automobiles to the performance and quality specifications demanded by today’s buyers, he said.
finis
hed, the car will target prosperous buyers with families who also crave a big, luxurious vehicle.
Frank Yang, managing director at ZYNP International in Romulus, said the combination of the Detroit area’s existing transportation and manufacturing infrastructure, talent pool and cost-efficiency, along with government tax breaks, allow that US unit to pursue its plan to be a one-stop, full-service company in the engine cylinder industry. ZYNP International’s ability to offer customers R&D, engineering, supply chain management, manufacturing and financing under one roof “differentiates us from competitors, either locally or internationally”, Yang said.
A wide range
“All this is hard to find in other areas of the country,” he said. “Detroit is the hub.”
Showing that being Chinese doesn’t guarantee a job here, ZYND’s Romulus-based engineering staff hail from a range of countries, including China, the US, Brazil, Mexico and Canada. The company employs 50 to 80 people, including seasonal workers. Most are Americans or US residents. The staff include one or two Chinese nationals and very few Chinese Americans because the company emphasizes US industry experience.
“We only have visitors from our China operation to do troubleshooting, to undertake training, to give training, and to receive whatever knowledge they can take from the US,” Yang explained.
He said the company used its flexible pay system and entrepreneurship programs to lure valuable laid-off engineers “to grow together with us”.
At ZYNP, workers repackage engine cylinder liners in returnable containers, or “dunnage”, made in China for direct shipment to customers that include GM, Ford, Chrysler, Volvo, Nemak and Cummins.
ZYNP’s history dates back more than 50 years in Mengzhou, China, where it has its manufacturing operations. The company, which employs 3,500 people in China and North America, started ZYNP North America in two Romulus locations in 2005.
Program development manager Leslie Santos said Detroit’s bankruptcy “does not impact ZYNP’s business or plans. Although ZYNP is in the metropolitan Detroit area, that does not mean we are located in the city. We are not connected to Detroit as far as our administration or anything like that. We just say we’re in Detroit because Detroit is so well known as the automotive capital of the world,” she said.
Despite Motown’s well-publicized woes, the Chinese automotive companies’ arrival has triggered an influx of companies from other fields. The new arrivals are “looking for clean technologies, environmental and water solutions” as directed by China’s latest Five-Year Plan, according to Milan Stevanovich, business community development officer with the Detroit Chinese Business Association.
“We’ve had such an overabundance of automotive engineers here over the last five years. A lot of these engineers here are now either working with angel capitalists or are just starting new startups in all these new emerging sectors,” Stevanovich said. “It’s quite an exciting time to be here in Michigan.”
Some observers see China eventually joining Japan, Germany, South Korea and other foreign countries in making and selling vehicles in the US. A March report by the US Congressional Research Service said the Chinese government ultimately is “seeking to develop vehicles that will be built in China and exported more widely to other markets, as the Japanese and Koreans did earlier”.
China already is a major importer of US auto parts. Last year it imported about $1.6 billion parts, according to United States International Trade Commission statistics. The Congressional Research Service report says recent acquisitions of US parts companies will help Chinese parts makers “target technology and product innovations to enhance their operations” back home while “also permitting a shift from supplying low-margin parts to more profitable activities, such as integrating parts into component systems”.
Joint venture
China’s recent acquisitions include Chinese auto-parts conglomerate Wanxiang Group’s $250 million acquisition early this year of US battery maker A123 Systems Inc; the purchase by Pacific Century Motors, a joint venture between the Beijing municipal government and another Chinese partner, of Nexteer Automotive from GM in 2010 for $450 million, the largest Chinese acquisition of a US auto parts company; and the purchase by Beijing West Industries, a joint venture of two Chinese State-owned enterprises, of the suspension and brake units of Delphi Corp in 2009 for $100 million.
Making and selling vehicles in the US would cap off the Chinese auto industry’s 30-year effort to develop globally, which reached a milestone in 2009 when it overtook the US to become the world’s largest producer of and market for motor vehicles.
Jerry Xu says the days of China making and selling cars in the US could happen.
“China is not the first group to come here to do business,” Xu said. “There’s Korean, Japanese, there’s German.
“As long as you have good quality and service, the American market is open for you.”
But the Chinese firms “have to better themselves. They have to make sure they provide value to get business market share here,” he said. “They have to continue to prove themselves, make sure they have a long-term plan to grow here. To be successful, they have to make themselves a citizen of their community.”
Changan’s Su says the US may have to wait five to 10 years to see the first Chinese car sold here, given the engineering techniques typically demanded by developed nations, including pollution-control and safety features. He cites the slow rise of Japan’s Toyota Motor Corp as an example of how emerging nations can eventually break through in the fiercely competitive global market.
“Twenty-five years ago, the Japanese came here and tried to study the US market,” Su said. Now Toyota can match strides with GM and Ford in the world market. But even Toyota is a relative newcomer to the US marketplace compared with one particular Detroit icon that still continues to have its world headquarters in the Motor City.
“General Motors,” he said, “is more than 100 years old.”
Contact the writer at michaelbarris@chinadailyusa.com
"Made in America": The Competitiveness Imperative
in Uncategorized/by MAM TeamDon’t get me wrong, it’s worth negotiating trade agreements that will open markets abroad and provide effective enforcement for rules-based trade, if they guarantee a level playing field for American workers, farmers, ranchers, and businesses. But the administration and perhaps Congress apparently haven’t learned from the mistakes of the past: Before we negotiate, we must get our own house in order, and we must seek far tougher trade terms. We have leverage, after all, as we remain the gold-standard consumer market in the world.
Our goal should be to cut the U.S. goods trade deficit in half by 2017. This can be accomplished by tackling Japanese and Chinese currency manipulation and by ensuring our workers and businesses aren’t forced to compete with state-supported industries abroad.
But even the best trade policy can’t hide the fact that our manufacturing sector receives little, if any, domestic policy support from Washington. First, look at the tax code: Our exports are taxed overseas through value-added taxes in over 150 countries, leaving us at a competitive disadvantage that trade agreements cannot erase. Those nations’ imports to the U.S. are effectively subsidized through VAT rebates while the meager tax support that manufacturing receives in the U.S. is under attack by Wall Street and importers.
American manufacturers are forced to work around a substandard infrastructure desperately in need of repair, yet public construction expenses as a percentage of GDP are dropping like a rock. Our chief competitors, meanwhile, have modern ports, passenger rail, and transportation hubs. And despite the president’s assurances that these jobs can’t be outsourced, major projects like New York City’s Verrazano-Narrows Bridge rehabilitation and the new San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge include massive amounts of Chinese steel — work that could have gone to U.S. factories.
We’re also under-investing in human capital. To be sure, community colleges are slowly scraping the rust off of the manufacturing talent pipeline, and some communities are putting vocational educational opportunities back into place for high school students. But the response so far from D.C. has been completely inadequate to meet the needs of the manufacturing sector, particularly if re-shoring becomes more of a trend and as retirements from an aging workforce begin to pile up. Our high-road competitors abroad possess mature, seamless programs to train young people, provide them with apprenticeships, and place them in high-wage jobs in modern factories.
Finally, public investment in innovation is strong in the United States, but it focuses entirely too much on ideas that end up in products made overseas. Taxpayer-financed research made MP3 player technology possible, but none of those devices are currently made in America. Investing in manufacturing innovation and engineering is essential, so that the production of the next idea — the one that hasn’t even been imagined yet — is done here. Otherwise, America will be known as the 21stcentury high-unemployment incubator of fascinating ideas.
Our era is defined by a breathtaking “app” economy but a collapsing real-world economy. Two more trade deals as they’re currently constituted won’t change that equation. Making American manufacturers and their workers more competitive, on the other hand, will allow Democrats and Republicans to fulfill their “made in America” promises and boost our economy.
Scott Paul is president of the Alliance for American Manufacturing.
Moto X: All the Details About Motorola's Made-in-America Smartphone
in Uncategorized/by MAM Team“We started to think about smartphones, and the main thing we realized was they weren’t very smart,” Motorola Senior Vice President of Product Management Rick Osterloh said at the phone’s unveiling. “We see a lack of innovation because we think there is a lack of imagination.”
Motorola has put its imagination into making the Moto X a highly customizable phone with a few unique software tricks.
Colorful and Customizable Hardware
The 4.7-inch, 1280×720-resolution Moto X is a big-screened smartphone like many other Android phones, but the hardware differences are in the shape of the device and in the colors you can get it in. The phone has a very comfortable curved back with a small dimple in the center of the back to rest your finger in.
But if you order your Moto X through Motorola’s Moto Maker website you can customize the color of the back of the phone, the edges and even the color of the volume and power buttons and the ring around the camera. There 2,000 color combinations to choose from and the company is even working on a back made of wood.
In addition you can engrave a message or name on back of the phone. You can upload your contacts and a photo for the wallpaper before the phone ships out of the Fort Worth facility within four days of placing the order. However, to start, the color-customized versions of the phone will be available only with AT&T service. The other carriers, including Verizon and Sprint, will have black and white versions of the phone in stores and on their websites.
The phone is powered by 2GB of RAM and Motorola’s Moto X Mobile Computing system, which the company says includes a series of chips. (A Snapdragon S4 Pro processor, quad-core Adreno 320 GPU, a contexual computing processor and a natural language processor, if you’re interested in the details.)
That power is important though for the new Android software tricks. Similar to some of the features available in Motorola’s new Droid phones for Verizon, the Moto X has what the company calls “Touchless Controls” and an “Active Display” features. The touchless control works similarly to Google Glass, without having to touch the phone your phone can listen to you. After training it, you should be able to say “OK Google Now call mom,” without ever tapping or lifting the phone.
The Active Display feature aims to solve checking your lockscreen for the time or new messages. You don’t have to wake the screen, instead, periodically the phone will flash the time and if you have any new messages. Even with those notifications, the company promises up to 24 hours of battery life.
Motorola also doesn’t want you to spend too long trying to get at your camera. The phone has a 10-megapixel camera that you can get to by just shaking the phone, launching the viewfinder in under three seconds. You can take a photo by just tapping on the screen; the phone will auto focus for you. You can customize all the camera settings, however, if you’d prefer to manually turn on the camera and take the photo. The phone will ship with Android 4.2.2 and will be updated to Android 4.3 soon.
Availability and Pricing
The Moto X will be available at the end of this month or at the beginning of September, through AT&T, T-Mobile Verizon, Sprint, US Cellular and Best Buy. The 16GB model will cost $199 and the 32GB version $249. The company says it might eventually offer a version directly through the Google Play Store.
And don’t worry, if you order one through the Moto Maker in different colors and don’t like it, you can redesign or return it within 14 days of purchase.
Motorola's New Smartphone: Made in the U.S.A., but Not for Much Pay
in Uncategorized/by MAM TeamToday, Google-owned Motorola is officially announcing the new Moto X, an Android-powered device that, as its ads remind us, will be the first smartphone actually manufactured in the United States. Motorola is teaming with Flextronics to assemble the handsets at a former Nokia factory in Fort Worth, Texas, which will eventually employ somewhere around 2,000 workers.
In other words, we’re all finally about to see what happens when a tech company actually tries to bring production back to the U.S. of A. from low-wage Asia, much as Apple is planning to do with some of its Macs, and how much the resulting new jobs will actually pay.
In some cases, it appears, the answer is not much. Flextronics seems to have kept mum about wages. But after a little bit of surfing around jobs boards, I was able to find some help wanted ads from a staffing company that don’t leave a whole lot of questions about what factory they were headhunting for. (Here’s a link to the one below.)
None of this should be particularly shocking. The generous manufacturing wages of mid-century America are mostly a memory at this point. Even the United Auto Workers have negotiated a two-tiered wage system that start’s new assembly hands at about $14 an hour, half of what their older colleagues make. Meanwhile, we are, in the end, talking about smartphone manufacturing, an industry where the vast majority of the supply chain exists in Asia, right alongside plentiful cheap labor. Chinese wages have been rising fast, but anybody looking to compete while making handsets in the U.S. is still going to need to minimize costs.
We’re also talking about Fort Worth, where the living wage for a single adult is $9.27, according to MIT’s living wage calculator. I doubt that that’s an accident. It makes sense that Motorola would look for a location where it wouldn’t have to pay its workers highly.
The new factory won’t just lead to production jobs. Flextronics also appears to be hiring engineers, for instance. But in general, I think this is a reminder that even if the United States really is on the verge of bringing back loads of manufacturing work from overseas, as many believe, we have to temper our expectations for what that will mean.
UPDATE 6:19 PM: In an email, a Flextronics spokeswoman confirmed that the advertised wages were indeed accurate: “Please be advised that the posted wages you inquired about are reflective of some of the positions Flextronics is hiring for in Fort Worth and are competitive market wages. Please note that Flextronics is also hiring for managerial and other positions and those job postings can be found at flextronics.com.”
Obama's Amazon Economy
in Uncategorized/by MAM TeamAmericans have fantastic, otherworldly tech gadgets to play with at home but 70,000 structurally deficient, real-world bridges over which we drive every day. Last year we could tweet news instantly about Hurricane Sandy’s effects on New York City but we could not find any Made-in-America electrical transformers to supply power to those in need. As taxpayers we have financed breathtaking research that has led to extraordinary devices like MP3 players, but good luck finding one that’s made in America today.
While the consumption slice of our economy is doing better, the productive sector is barely treading water. And it should be no surprise; this is exactly the way our economic policy is skewed today.
President Obama said he was going to change all that. But he hasn’t.
In 2009, President Obama said that the world could no longer depend on American consumers as an engine of growth, and that we should bring our economy more into balance — exporting and saving more, while reducing our reliance on borrowing and imports.
During the 2012 election, President Obama pledged to add one million new manufacturing jobs and get tough on China’s trade cheating. So far in his second term, though, we’ve added only 13,000 new factory jobs and our trade deficit with China, $315 billion last year, is breaking records.
What would be helpful is a real-world focus on the economy from Washington. We see lots of finger-pointing, but little action. And Obama’s speeches thus far have reflected that: Lots of promises of action and exhortations that he gets it, but little in the way of policy. But there are steps right now that President Obama could be taking without Congress:
There’s a lot that Congress could do… but that’s another blog post.
Perhaps more than anything else, the President could rally Americans behind these ideas. Trade policy needs to be a dinner-table topic in this country, because trade policy puts manufacturing jobs at stake. These jobs are worth fighting for. And it’s time that manufacturing workers felt so valued around the clock, not just at election time.
About Scott Paul:
Scott N. Paul is President of the Alliance for American Manufacturing (AAM), a partnership established in 2007 by some of America’s leading manufacturers and the United Steelworkers union. Mr. Paul and AAM have worked to make American manufacturing a top-of-mind issue for voters and our national leaders through effective advocacy, innovative research, and a savvy public relations strategy.
CLICK HERE FOR MR. PAUL’S FULL BIO
Bangladesh Garment Workers Set Fire to Factory over Benefits
in Uncategorized/by MAM TeamFirefighters battled to control the blaze which gutted the warehouse on the ground floor of the factory at Mouchak, 40 kilometres (25 miles) north of Dhaka.
“The workers angrily protested at the amount of bonus they got from the owners for the upcoming Eid al-Fitr festival,” local police chief Omar Faruq said.
“At one stage they walked out of the factory and set the godown (warehouse), which was on the ground floor of the factory, on fire,” Faruq told AFP from the site.
Protests over poor wages and benefits have hit Bangladesh’s garment industry, the country’s economic mainstay, since April when a factory complex collapsed and killed more than 1,100 people.
The fire, which started at about 2.30 pm at the five-storey Libas Textiles factory, was now under control, said a police officer, Sanwar Hossain.
The April disaster highlighted appalling conditions in Bangladesh’s 4,500 garment factories, where workers toil for 10-12 hours a day for basic monthly wages of around $40.
Fearing large-scale protests ahead of Eid al-Fitr, the government has asked factory owners to pay salaries and bonuses early.
The holiday marking the end of the holy month of Ramadan is due on August 10. About 90 percent of Bangladesh’s 153 million people are Muslims.
According to local media, some factories have told their workers that they might not be able to make payments on time because of shipment delays and non-payment by buyers.
The country is the world’s second largest garment manufacturer after China, with the bulk of its $21.5 billion annual shipments going to top Western retailers such as Walmart, H&M and Inditex.
In Bankrupt Detroit, Shinola Puts Its Faith In American Manufacturing
in Uncategorized/by MAM Team“You come in clean and you get to leave clean,” said the 35-year-old suburban Detroit resident, who spent nine and a half years working for an automotive supplier. In that job, she said, “there was grease everywhere.”
Watch-making in the United States is a lost art, save for a handful of high-end custom watch builders. The last American watch company, Hamilton, was bought by a Swiss watchmaker in 1971 and moved from Pennsylvania to Switzerland in 2003. Indeed, most watches today come from Asia or Switzerland.
But here in bankrupt Detroit, Tom Kartsotis, a wealthy entrepreneur who thinks American manufacturing still has a future, is creating a watch company from scratch in a city that knows a thing or two about manufacturing.
The company says it expects to produce 45,000 watches this year, and up to 500,000 annually by 2014 or 2015. With an average price of $600 apiece, Shinola watches are now sold at Barney’s, Saks, Neiman Marcus, Bloomingdales and Nordstrom. Besides watches, Shinola also sells $2,000 custom-built bicycles and leather goods, all with an American pedigree. It’s also producing limited edition watches under licensing agreements with other brands, such as Ford Motor, which plans to sell a Shinola-built watch to commemorate next year’s launch of the 50th anniversary Ford Mustang.
Last month Shinola opened two retail locations, one in Detroit’s vibrant Midtown neighborhood and another in New York’s Tribeca neighborhood.
There have been growing pains, however. Shinola’s first batch of 2,500 watches – a special edition priced at $550 — sold out on the web in eight days. Unfortunately, many of those customers are still waiting for their watches because of early production snafus.
Shinola, which now has more than 100 employees, admits it has gotten a little ahead of itself in launching the brand, which included a recent full page ad in The New York Times. “This early demand is applying a tremendous amount of pressure on a young company that is trying to do something that’s never been done quite like this before, and we have to ask for your patience,” according to a blog post on Shinola’s web site this week. “At some point we are certain we will be able to catch up with demand but, for now, this is a pretty wild ride.” The company says those limited edition watches are being shipped this month.
Kartsotis, 53, is best known for founding Fossil, the popular accessories brand. He was CEO from the start in 1984 until 2000, and remained chairman until 2010 while gradually reducing his stake to less than 5 percent. His brother, Kosta, now runs the Richardson, Texas, company.
Since then, Tom Kartsotis, whose last-reported Fossil holdings are worth an estimated $320 million, has been pouring most of his resources into his venture capital firm, Bedrock. It invests in U.S.-based manufacturers like Seattle-based Filson, the 116-year-old outdoor clothing company it bought last year.
In the case of Shinola, however, Kartsotis is launching a new company under a brand made famous for shoe polish. The original Shinola brand was founded in 1907, and gained notoriety during World War I, when a disgruntled young soldier was said to have shined his commander’s boots with feces. The rumor led to the popular colloquialism, “You don’t know sh*t from Shinola.”
After one of Bedrock’s managers made the crack to an office colleague, the joke turned to a serious discussion about restoring the long-idled Shinola brand, whose trademark, it turned out, was available.
“We wanted to create an accessory company – mostly watches and leather goods – and create a ‘Made in the USA’ story,” said Bedrock chief executive Heath Carr, who left Fossil to run the investment company for Kartsotis a year and a half ago. “We’re very bullish on the U.S., first off, and two, it would be a differentiator in the marketplace.”
But why Detroit, a city so broke it can’t afford to provide even the most basic services to its shrunken population? Carr says a better question is, “Why not?”
“I don’t pretend Detroit doesn’t have challenges,” said Carr, who remains based in Dallas while leaving Shinola’s day-to-day management to CEO Steve Bock. “There’s no hiding that. But there’s such an energy there. It’s wildly contagious.”
And with no established workforce for watch-making in the U.S., Detroit was as good a place as any to start the company, he said. Its manufacturing heritage would lend a degree of authenticity to Shinola products, the company figured.
To see if that hunch was right, Bedrock commissioned a focus group and asked participants whether they preferred a $5 pen from China, a $10 pen made in the USA or a $15 pen made in Detroit. People preferred the cheaper Chinese pen, but were willing to pay the higher premium for one made in Detroit. That was a signal that consumers would pay for an authentic American-made watch and that Detroit’s reputation as an industrial leader was still intact, despite its well-publicized woes.
So in late 2011, Bedrock officials visited Detroit to search for a manufacturing site. Their trip included a visit to the Industrial Design school at the College for Creative Studies, which took over GM’s former research lab a few years ago. By chance, the elevator in the 12-story building stopped unexpectedly on the fifth floor, which was vacant. “We stuck our heads out and said, ‘What about this space?’” Carr recalled. “We had seen buildings earlier in the day but it would have been a multi-year process to do all the remodeling. This space was fairly clean and ready to go and so we were able to advance our timeline pretty significantly.”
Bedrock knew nothing about watch-making, however, so it sought help from Ronda, a Swiss watch-maker, to design the factory, install the equipment and teach employees the fine points of watch assembly.
Shinola’s watch movements require 46 individual pieces – tiny coils, springs and wheels – that are so small that employees sitting inches from their work must use magnifying loupes and tweezers, vacuum styluses and micro-screwdrivers to assemble them. Using a kit of parts made by Ronda in Switzerland, each Shinola technician adds a few parts to the movement before passing it to the next station. Along the way, workers perform multiple quality checks to make sure the parts are well-lubricated and working together properly. Each batch of movements is checked for precision by a certified watchmaker.
Once the movement is built, the remainder of the watch takes shape: setting the dial and the hands, assembling the watch case, adding the crown, closing the case back or crystal and adding the leather straps. Then, each watch is tested again for time-keeping accuracy, quality and waterproofing.
Carr said Shinola relies on the help of a small band
of
American craftsmen, who were not easy to find. “We were naïve about the manufacturing process in the U.S.,” said Carr. “A lot more manufacturing had gone overseas than we originally anticipated.”
Eventually, however, Bedrock was able to identify a handful of suppliers still manufacturing handcrafted materials in the U.S. Chicago’s last leather tannery, Horween, for example, supplies the vegetable-tanned leather for Shinola’s products. That leather is then sewn into watchbands, journals and other leather goods by a small manufacturer in Saint Genevieve, Mo., called Eric Scott. Edwards Brothers Malloy, a specialty paper manufacturer in Ann Arbor, Mich., makes recycled paper for the journals. Bicycle frames are made by hand by a Wisconsin company called Waterford Precision Cycles, then shipped to Detroit for assembly.
Even hiring a master watchmaker proved difficult until Shinola found Stefan Mihoc, a Romanian immigrant who had been working as a machinist in the Detroit area for more than a decade because there were no watch-making jobs in America when he arrived in the late 1980s. Now Shinola has two master watchmakers.
The city’s bankruptcy filing is only a minor concern, said Carr. “I think it’s difficult for people to live in a bankrupt city. If people are not living there, you don’t have a workforce,” he said. But Shinola didn’t take a penny of incentives to locate in the city. “We’re in Detroit because we fell in love with Detroit,” he said. “You can’t wait for city government to give you better direction. As a business, you’ve got to move. Detroit has a lot of challenges, but that makes it an interesting place to be. It’s almost like it drives the business folks harder. That’s the energy.”
All American Clothing Invites Shoppers to Make It an American-Made School Year
in News/by MAM TeamThe trend of losing American jobs in the clothing industry will continue if consumers are not buying American. Roger Simmermaker of WND reported in March of 2013 that 97 percent of the clothing purchased in the United States is foreign made (http://www.wnd.com/2013/03/getting-apparel-from-that-important-3/). This school season is a perfect time to be mindful of shopping habits. Not everything purchased should be American made in those shopping carts but a few items will certainly help create jobs.
About All American Clothing Co.
At the All American Clothing Co. shoppers can actually trace items back to the American workers they are supporting with the All American Clothing Co. That`s right, consumers can trace All American-made jeans back to the American farmer who grew the cotton with an interactive feature called traceability technology. One purchase falling under traceability technology can ultimately support over 12,000 American farmers who grew the cotton used in their USA made jeans according to the All American Clothing Co.
The company was founded in 2002 when Lawson Nickol made a shocking discovery. To his surprise, his previous blue jean employer began to outsource. After he confirmed this with ownership, Nickol quickly turned in his resignation and started the All American Clothing Co. just a few weeks later with his son BJ. Since, the All American Clothing Co. has become a household name as they only carry USA made clothing items.
American Made products may seem difficult to shop for. They are often hard to find and afford. With this being said, the All American Clothing Co. has always been dedicated to making the American-made shopping experience easy and affordable.
“Sometimes shopping American made is not always easy. But when it is…it`s All American.”
Made in America Trend Drives Industrial Demand
in Uncategorized/by MAM TeamAs manufacturers continue to weigh the costs of moving goods in today’s market, increases in labor, shipping, and fuel expenses are driving many global companies to bring production back to North America. The result is an increasing demand for industrial real estate in Southern California.
Manufacturers and distributors are now increasingly seeking factory, warehouse and distribution space in Los Angeles, Orange County, and the Inland Empire in order to utilize local ports, as well as expanding class one double track rails from L.A. to the East coast.
While lower-end consumer products, such as apparel and toys, are still manufactured overseas, production of other items, such as instrumentation, devices, machinery and equipment, is moving closer to end users in the US. Much of this is because there is a lower tolerance for error when it comes to these products, which require process manufacturing. For example, the production of surgical equipment, such as laser technology for cataract surgery, must be extremely precise, or the repercussions could be enormous.
This is especially important in the current market, in which ecommerce fulfillment has become the norm. Traditionally, manufacturers would build a distribution center and analyze palate positions, then ship product to 10 customers in 200 locations, with perhaps 100 unique products. Today, manufacturers are tasked with same day and next day fulfillment for anywhere from 10,000 to a million unique products, often shipping to up to 25 million customers per year.
For these manufacturers, it’s imperative to have a real estate professional who can assist with analyzing technology and locational considerations against inbound and outbound customer bases in order to make the right decisions.
The fact is, if we as commercial real estate professionals are doing are jobs well, we actually want to reduce the footprint of our industrial clients. This may appear counterintuitive to what people in our industry usually strive to do, which is to sell more square footage. However, by developing a deeper understanding of global logistics, we can advise our clients on innovative ways to minimize on-hand inventory, which reduces their need for fixed real estate assets.
In addition to advising clients, commercial real estate professionals who are well educated on supply chain issues will also be better able to identify the benefits and detriments of each location, specifically as they relate to moving inbound goods into the supply chain for the end customer.
Depending on the product being manufactured or distributed, there are various modalities to transport goods, and by deepening our knowledge of ocean, air, and intermodal transport, we are better able to establish the right solutions, depending on the service metrics our clients are trying to achieve.
This leads to better alignment with all who are involved in real estate deal making, including the executive management team, the operations team on both the transportation and distribution side, and the manufacturing team.
As manufacturing and distribution continues to expand and return to North America, industrial real estate professionals should seek educational opportunities to better understand our clients’ business from raw products to manufacturing to finished goods. With that understanding, we will ultimately be able to deliver better solutions.
Kevin Turner is a SVP and global logistics specialist at Voit Real Estate Services. The views expressed in this column are the author’s own.
Can Fashion Clean Up Its Act?
in Uncategorized/by MAM TeamRead more at The Nation: http://www.thenation.com/article/175317/can-fashion-clean-its-act#ixzz2aScp91p1
Follow us: @thenation on Twitter | TheNationMagazine on Facebook
Written by: Elizabeth Cline
Elizabeth Cline is a New York–based journalist and the author of Overdressed: The Shockingly High Cost of Cheap Fashion.